相信80%的非母语投稿者都收到过这一类审稿意见——“语言问题”，大家在收到它的时候或许心里一凉。但你知道吗，还有更狠的审稿评论！有些简直就像是科研版的“吐槽大会”，犀利程度让人瞠目结舌，给作者留下深深的心理阴影......

我从知乎搜集了一些非常之“毒舌”的SCI评论，太真实了，已经狠狠代入了：

1、The results are as weak as wet noodles. （结论跟湿面条一样软弱无力）

2、The authors are amateur. （作者怕不是个兼职的）

3、Why chase a gene in this ridiculous organism? （为什么在这种荒诞的生物里追求一个基因）

4、I started reading this manuscript with much anticipation.But my enthusiasm was short lived. （我满怀期待读这篇文章，但热情很短）

5、I have rarely a more blown-up and annoy paper in the last couple of years than this hot-air balloon manuscript. （我过去几年都没读过这篇像屁一样烦人的文章）

6、Figure3. This figure is silly. （这图好蠢呐）

7、This paper makes no contribution. （这文章有个锤子的贡献）

8、The biggest problem with manuscript, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style. （这篇稿子审得我都想自挂东南枝了）

9、This paper is desperate. Please reject it complete and then block The author's email ID so they can't use The online system future. （文章太差了，麻烦封掉作者的账号以免他以后再投稿）

10、The work is trivial, and there is no novelty in the work, the approach or the results. The authors do not solve anything and the implications in this context are quite possibly irrelevant. （这篇论文很零碎，从内容、方法到结果统统没新意。作者没有解决任何问题，在这种情况下，这篇论文几乎没啥卵用。）

大家在投稿时见过最狠的SCI评论是什么？在评论区分享一下吧！